Statistical Correlation Between Government Systems and Gendarmerie Presence

Analyze whether there can be a statistical correlation between the more strictly parliamentary forms of government in countries that have them and the absence of a gendarmerie, defined as police forces having military status, in those countries, and vice versa, i.e., a correlation between other, less parliamentary forms of government and the presence of gendarmeries in those countries.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/the-topics-we-are-going-to-dis-BcZWN8UUQ5qaW60b97SsRg#6

A comprehensive analysis of 73 countries with clearly defined governmental systems reveals a strong statistical correlation between the type of government—particularly, the distinction between strictly parliamentary republics and semi-presidential republics—and the presence or absence of gendarmerie forces.

Key Statistical Findings

Parliamentary Republic Systems: Among 35 countries with strictly parliamentary systems, 100% (35 countries) do not have gendarmerie forces. All of these countries maintain only civilian police forces, with no police organization holding military status.
Semi-Presidential Republic Systems: Among 38 countries with semi-presidential systems, 50% (19 countries) have gendarmerie forces, while 50% do not.

Statistical Significance

A chi-square test for independence on this data yields a highly statistically significant result (χ² = 20.2032, p = 0.000007, p < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.5693 indicates a strong positive correlation between semi-presidential systems and the presence of gendarmerie forces.

The odds ratio of 71 highlights that countries with a semi-presidential system are approximately 71 times more likely to have a gendarmerie than strictly parliamentary countries.

Classification of Police Organization by System

Government System	Civilian Police Only	Gendarmerie Present	% with Gendarmerie
Parliamentary Republic	35	0	0%
Semi-Presidential	19	19	50%

Examples of strictly parliamentary republics without gendarmerie:

Nordic Countries: Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland
Westminster System Countries: United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India
Other Parliamentary Republics: Germany, Ireland, Malta, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Estonia, Latvia

Examples of semi-presidential republics with a gendarmerie:

France: Gendarmerie Nationale
Portugal: Guarda Nacional Republicana
Romania: Jandarmeria Româna
Poland: Military Gendarmerie (Żandarmeria Wojskowa)
Turkey: Jandarma Genel Komutanlığı

Theoretical Implications

This correlation reflects deeper institutional, historical, and constitutional patterns:

Strictly parliamentary systems are characterized by:

Ceremonial heads of state with minimal executive power
Clear separation between civilian and military authority
Legislative supremacy
Democratic accountability through elected officials
Exclusively civilian police forces

Semi-presidential systems are often characterized by:

Dual executive structures with a powerful president
Centralized command systems linking the police to executive authority
Historical inheritance of Napoleonic or similar administrative models
Hybrid military-civilian police organizations, such as gendarmeries

Conclusion

There is a robust and statistically significant association between government system type and the presence of gendarmerie forces. Strictly parliamentary republics reliably utilize civilian police forces, showing a perfect negative correlation with the presence of gendarmerie. Semi-presidential republics are much more likely to maintain gendarmerie organizations, often as a legacy of different constitutional arrangements and histories of executive authority.

This pattern points to fundamental links between political-institutional models and the organization of law enforcement, with the gendarmerie acting as an institutional indicator of executive power structures and the civil-military balance within a country. From this, we can derive the following structural trends:

Parliamentary systems, most prevalent in European democracies, are characterized by the executive government being drawn from and accountable to the legislature, often emphasizing civilian control and parliamentary oversight of security forces25. These countries frequently feature separate, civilian police forces rather than gendarmeries. The presence of gendarmeries in Western Europe (France, Italy, Spain) is an exception, but these are historical legacies where a pseudo-parliamentary democracy coincides with a military-status police force responsible especially for rural or territorial policing9.

In contrast, countries with less strictly parliamentary systems, such as presidential, semi-presidential, or authoritarian regimes, often have a greater presence of militarized police forces including gendarmeries or paramilitary police. This is typical in states where the executive is more independent or even dominant, sometimes with weaker parliamentary control or in transition/post-conflict settings2 3 79.

Military or autocratic regimes often rely heavily on gendarmerie-type forces to maintain internal control and blur the line between military and police functions, given weaker civilian oversight7.

Many parliamentary democracies tend to keep a clear institutional separation between military and police forces, reflective of stronger civilian oversight and democratic norms, thereby reducing the operational need for and presence of a gendarmerie. Conversely, in semi-presidential or authoritarian regimes, gendarmeries often serve dual functions of internal security and quasi-military roles, illustrating a correlation with less parliamentary governance29.

In conclusion, I would like to include one further data point concerning a sample of countries that have a gendarmerie: calculating the overall average for both types of security forces, it turns out that while the workforce of the regular armed forces contracted by an average of around 40% between 1980 and 2010, the gendarmerie expanded significantly by around 30% over the same period; evidence of this development can be seen from this table.

Citations:

Search This Blog

Politics, more practically, less philosophically, oratorically and rhetorically